Archive | Micro-sourcing

Asia is the path to success

Shifting jobs overseas gets bad press but in the Asian Century, it’s the path to business success and survival.


By
Ash Truscott

In a recent report, the Australian Services Union and Finance Sector Union claim that offshoring staff leads to a net loss of Australian jobs. Our experience suggests instead that offshore staffing can be a catalyst for business growth – and could even lead to an expansion in the Australian workforce.

More than 64 per cent of MicroSourcing’s Australian clients – all small and medium enterprises that lease offshore staff at our headquarters in the Philippines – say their initial decision to outsource was based on a desire to expand their team. Only 25 per cent say they used offshore labour to replace some of their existing staff.

What’s more, since hiring their first offshore staff member, 43 per cent of Australian MicroSourcing clients have seen their Australian workforce grow. A further 36 per cent have maintained the size of their Australian team, while only 21 per cent say their home workforce has contracted.

The ASU and FSU claim the US economy has suffered due to offshoring, and Australia should be wary of following the same path. But in fact our US clients tell a remarkably similar story to their Australian counterparts. Since engaging offshore staff, 44 per cent of them have seen their US-based workforce grow. Thirty-six per cent have maintained current staffing levels.

Rather than being the destructive bogyman the unions make it out to be, our clients’ experience suggests that offshore staffing can be an innovative solution for cash-strapped small businesses looking to kick-start their growth phase.

The debate about offshore staffing has focused on big business setting up vast call centres in India, but in reality it is Australian small businesses that stand to benefit the most from accessing affordable talent as they expand their business and forge into new markets.

In fact, offshore staff leasing might be the only viable staffing solution for start-up companies who simply cannot attract or afford the right people to join their firm. Once they kick-start their growth through offshore staff, they usually hire skilled workers in Australia too.

Our research suggests that offshore staffing is not a zero sum game. While some companies will move jobs overseas, others will use offshore staff to complement their Australian workforce and ultimately help their business grow.

Jobs data from the Bureau of Statistics supports our findings. The ASU and FSU claim in their report that 20,000 jobs a year are being ”lost” offshore. But this ignores the fact that more than 65,000 jobs were created in the Australian economy over the past 12 months and unemployment remains relatively low.

There is no doubt that technological innovation will force structural changes on the Australian workforce. To date there is little evidence to suggest this will lead to an overall loss of Australian jobs.

Digital technology means that an Aussie software designer can be based in Kalgoorlie while contracting to an employer in Silicon Valley. We rightly applaud this type of labour exchange as a great example of globalisation working in our favour. But we must also be aware that this kind of innovation goes both ways.

That’s why former Treasury secretary Ken Henry exhorted Aussie companies to embrace offshoring in his comments last month in a Sydney speech, signalling this is likely to be a recommendation in his highly anticipated ”Australia in the Asian Century” white paper.

Henry knows that Australia’s long-term economic viability must be based on expanding our exports into Asia. To do this effectively, we must embrace new technologies and efficiencies available to us – including offshoring.

The 20th century saw Australia transform itself from a highly protected economy into a remarkably open one. We decided long ago that the benefits of free trade in manufacturing and agriculture, which accrue both to Australia and our neighbours, far outweigh any advantage we may be able to buy by imposing tariffs and other trade barriers.

This lesson applies equally today. The unions claim more government intervention will ”save” service sector jobs. But ultimately it will just hurt the economy – and the wider workforce. Only by collaborating with the region will our economy grow.

Offshoring, like all other forms of hiring staff, does have risks. As every business owner or manager knows, not all employees work out. Choosing the right partner provider for your business and having a strong integration plan helps minimise the risks associated with offshore staffing. But ruling out offshoring altogether, or imposing more regulation as the unions suggest, will only have a negative impact on productivity.

Technological change and the fast-paced economic development of our neighbours mean the regional economy is changing fast. By taking a head-in-the-sand approach and refusing to keep up, Australia runs the risk of being left behind.

Ash Truscott is the managing director of MicroSourcing Australasia, an outsourcing company with staff in the Philippines.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/offshoring-is-not-the-bogyman-20121016-27ovt.html#ixzz29tcn9mNi

Posted in Micro-sourcing, OffshoringComments (0)

Meet the Microworkers

A new breed of online worker is paid by the task

By Rachael King

When Julia Lee first heard of Tongal, she thought it was a scam. Tongal pays people—anyone with a good idea, really—to create online videos for companies such as Mattel, Allstate, and Popchips. Companies typically pay $15,000 to $20,000 for each project they post on Tongal’s website. Tongal runs the projects like contests. Yet, instead of a winner-take-all approach, it breaks up the projects into stages, such as ideas and videos. The top-five ideas are rewarded with cash and then participants in the video phase can use any of those five ideas to create the video.

Lee’s first submission, an idea for a 30-second commercial for a wine-related iPhone app won $1,000 and it only took three hours of work. When she created an animated video for a nonprofit, she earned $4,000. There have also been projects where her ideas or videos didn’t make the top five, so she didn’t make any money. Still, in the past year, Lee, 36, has earned more than $6,000 for about 100 hours of work, or $60 an hour on average. “It helped me pay off my credit-card bills,” she says. In addition to supplementing her salary from her job at San Francisco nonprofit Volunteer-Match, Lee is finally able to put her Master of Fine Art degree to good use. She says she’d like to save money to make a film someday.

The idea of breaking up a job into small pieces and then using the Internet to find workers to do those tasks was pioneered by LiveOps about a decade ago and Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk in 2005. LiveOps lets call-center workers sign on for shifts in 30-minute increments and then uses the Web to route calls to them. Mechanical Turk pays per task—often less than 50 cents—for quick jobs like checking Web pages for errors or transcribing audio recordings.

The trend, which goes by many names—crowd-sourcing, the human cloud, micro-work—uses the Internet to access workers around the world for short-term projects that pay a few bucks to hundreds of dollars per hour. The tasks might require a few minutes or a few days to complete. Benefits to companies include finding large numbers of workers to complete projects quickly, finding niche expertise, saving money, and making better use of in-house resources. It also lets Western workers, in places with a high cost of living, compete directly with those in developing markets. For many freelancers, microwork gives them unprecedented flexibility to work almost anywhere at any time.

BIG COMPANIES USE MICRO-SOURCED WORK

Microsoft turned to uTest in 2009 when it needed more than 100 testers around the world to find bugs in its security software and see how it would fare in places like China, India, Brazil, and Russia before being released. UTest has more than 33,000 testers in 172 countries, which means work can be done 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Companies pay only for the testing they need, rather than keep a team of testers on contract. At Santa Monica (Calif.)-based Tongal, companies such as Mattel and Robert Half International are getting 30-second online videos for a fraction of the $500,000 it costs to create a 30-second TV spot, says Tongal co-founder James DeJulio.

In 2008, Pfizer wanted to make employees more productive, so the company began letting them outsource certain tasks so they could focus on higher-value work. Employees can push a button on their desks and send out work like creating PowerPoint presentations or checking data in spreadsheets. The company contracted with several firms in the U.S. and abroad to do those tasks. In the first year, Pfizer estimated that the service freed up more than 66,000 hours for employees. That program still exists and Genpact, one of the providers, helps Pfizer with business intelligence work on demand.

Rachael King is writer for Bloomberg BusinessWeek. She has covered technology in the workplace for BusinessWeek since 2006. King’s work has appeared in Fortune, Business 2.0, Inc., Inter@ctive Week, and other publications. She received a National Editorial Award from the American Society of Business Publication Editors in 2005 and a Jesse H. Neal Award from the American Business Press in 1998. Previously, she worked at Architectural Digest and Bon Appetit. King holds a bachelor’s degree from UCLA.

Posted in featured, Micro-sourcing, News Archive, OutsourcingComments (0)

Page 1 of 11

Learn More About Mauritius



Speaking English in the Philippines








Our Strategic Partners